The mention of divorce likely brings to mind images of contentious arguments in a courtroom setting. If you are willing to divorce on decent terms with your spouse, though, there is a much more graceful and mutually-beneficial way to go about it.
Collaborative divorce is an alternative to the traditional divorce process with an emphasis on decreasing conflict. By knowing exactly how collaborative divorce differs from other divorce methods, you can be confident that you are choosing the path that is right for you and your soon-to-be ex-spouse.
How does collaborative divorce compare to traditional divorce?
The collaborative divorce process takes place outside of the courtroom, therefore ensuring your privacy and giving you the chance to negotiate more comfortably with the other party. The underlying principle of collaborative divorce is that both sides are working together to reach an outcome that is fair for everyone while still advocating for their own interests. The result is a less expensive and less stressful procedure in which you and your spouse retain full control, rather than deferring to the judgment of the court.
How does collaborative divorce compare to mediation?
Both collaborative divorce proceedings and mediation take place outside of court. The primary difference is that in a typical collaborative divorce, you may retain legal counsel that solely represents you and your interests. During a mediation session, you might compromise more than you would like under the guidance of a mediator who strives to satisfy both parties.
Collaborative divorce exists as a middle ground between traditional divorce and mediation. It is a strong option for couples who wish to amicably handle matters outside of court while still staunchly defending their positions.
